The Medical Journal of Australia published research on September 1, 2025, advocating for a “precautionary approach” to children’s social media use, arguing that absence of clear evidence of harm doesn’t mean harm is absent.
The research supports Australia’s under-16 social media ban as a “bold and precautionary move” while acknowledging debates over social media’s mental health impacts remain polarized. The authors argue the debate over correlation versus causation shouldn’t delay protective actions.
Experts call for systems-level changes including platform accountability, school initiatives, and research co-designed with young people. They emphasize the precautionary principle, which emphasizes proactive harm mitigation in the face of scientific uncertainty.
The research notes that one view attributes social media harm through social comparisons, cybervictimisation and fears of missing out. An alternative view attributes rising youth mental illness rates to broader societal factors and increased mental health awareness since the coronavirus pandemic.
The authors advocate for artificial intelligence algorithms to proactively identify and mitigate harmful content spread, while remaining mindful of biases AI can introduce. They call for improved transparency from social media companies concerning young people’s platform use.
This provides scientific backing for parents taking cautious approaches to children’s social media access before definitive research emerges.
Source: Medical Journal of Australia
Get coverage of global digital safety initiatives for families in Plugged In → [Subscribe Free]
